To be human

1 05 2012

Just a few questions to get you thinking.  Let’s start with something a little less heavy.  If a bird can no longer fly, is it still truly a bird?

What qualities do you think define a true human being?  The ability to think?  Having all 5 senses?  The ability to reason?  Is having human DNA and coming from human parents enough?

Is a mass murderer human?

Is a someone who is brain dead and on life support human?

Is an infant with no concept of self and who is completely reliant on others to stay alive human?

Do you believe you are a true human being?

No need to comment, just something to think about for yourself.  I’ll leave you with one of my favorite Xkcd comics:





A hypothesis about dieting and exercise

25 04 2012

My hypothesis

“The most important part of a diet is what you’re not eating.  There is no such thing as a “healthy food” which will cancel out crap food.  Exercising also does not cancel out crap food.”

The basic idea is that if you eat something good, it doesn’t mean you can also drink a soda.  If you go to the gym and jog for 15 minutes, it doesn’t mean you get to eat a candy bar.  Currently I have no real evidence except for observation, but it is something to consider if you are trying to lose weight and are unsuccessful.  If you really want to lose weight, go all out and drop all the crap.  If you need your crappy food fix, check out Tim Ferriss’s book Four Hour Body.  The diet is available for free on Gizmodo.

A little bit of evidence

People with celieac’s disease cannot eat something to “cancel out” gluten.  Gluten is crap for you, attacking your insides.  Eating a bowl of vegetables won’t cancel out that bowl of pasta.

Have you ever read about athletes having heart attacks?  I see at least one every 3 months.  All their exercise isn’t canceling out their crappy eating.  That or they’re on some form of drug, which is why this is a poor piece of evidence.

 

 





Only emulate the successful

21 04 2012

Something annoying to me: people taking advice from unsuccessful people.  For example, let’s imagine two people, Sarah and Bob.  We ask each of them: how can i get straight A’s?

Bob: “It’s easy.  You just need to listen in class, take a lot of notes, read through the books, and basically spend every waking moment studying.”

Me: “So Bob, is that how you get straight As?”

Bob: “No I’m not willing to put in the time so I don’t get straight A’s.”

Me: “Well how about you Sarah?”

Sarah: ” Well, in class I use a special note taking method called QEC.  It helps me understand rather than memorize.  Anything I don’t understand, I put a question mark by it and fill in the answer within a day or two, long before a test.  I have a very focused method of studying in which I set definite goals and shut off all outside communication so I don’t get distracted.  (… etc etc) I usually finish all my work within a few hours after school, then do whatever.  I do get straight A’s with this method.”

Most people are like Bob, they ‘know’ that you need to spend a lot of time studying to get A’s.  If you asked Bob for advice, he wouldn’t hesitate to tell you.  This annoys the crap out of me because why in the heck would you listen to Bob, who doesn’t have straight As but thinks he knows how to get them?  It should be obvious that Sarah is the one to listen to.

This started as a simple ranting blog post, but I came up with a useful tip.  Simply restructure your questioning to first ask if someone was successful at what you want to accomplish.  For example:

Did/do you get straight As?  Were you always a straight A student or did you adopt a strategy?  How can I get straight  As?

Have you been overweight, then lost that weight and kept it off?  How can I lose weight?

Were you ever skinny before putting on all that muscle?  How can I put on muscle?

You may have noticed another type of question I inserted into this new structure.  For lack of a better idea, I’ll call this the “natural talent eliminator” question.  You only want to take advice from people who have been in your situation and worked to get where you want to get.  It is not useful to ask someone who is naturally muscular how they put on muscle.  Nor is it useful to ask a genius how they study.  Nor is it useful to ask someone who is just naturally a stick figure how to lose weight (one reason behind such bad weight loss advice).

So in conclusion, when seeking advice or to learn something, consider using the following structure:

Did you achieve X? Are you just naturally talented/genetically lucky or did you research and develop a specific method to achieve X?  How can I achieve X?





End of self experiment: ground sleeping

17 04 2012

A couple weeks ago I brought my bed back into my room.  Although I am able to sleep on the ground, it is very annoying so I’m going back to my bed.    It’s hard to sleep on my back, I believe because my body just wants to sleep on its side (and according to some light reading, your body knows how it wants to sleep, an example of body communication, something I want to blog about later).  My bed is pretty firm, so I believe it provides everything I need while also allowing me to dig my shoulder into it.





“The perfect is the enemy of the good”

17 04 2012

taken from JD Roth, of getrichslowly.org, but I’m sure it’s been said before.

On my past blog post about the one bowl of vegetables diet, my friend asked if it matters if it’s fresh vegetables or frozen.  Long story short, it doesn’t matter.  Eat whatever you can get your hands on.  If that doesn’t work after a month, tweak it.  This goes back to the 80/20 rule.  A few things (20% of effort) leads to most of the results (80% of rewards).  It’s much more important to start eating a bowl of vegetables a day than to decide if you should go for frozen or fresh vegetables.

Here is a simple three step method for doing something well (good), but not perfect.  For simplicity let’s stick to the idea of a diet, but this could apply equally as well to working out, learning something, or a million other things.

First, you need a plan.  As the quote suggests, this plan does not need to be perfect, only good enough.  In terms of diet a good place to start would be the Paleo Solution, Primal Blueprint, Four Hour Body, or Atkins Revolution.

Second, you need to get started.  In the case of the diet you could just pick one at random, read the diet (a small part of each book), and get started.  Or, you could ask SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL IN YOUR VENTURE for advice.  In the case of the diet you need to find someone that was fat or got fat and then lost the weight.  It is not helpful to ask for help from people who are still overweight or from people who are naturally skinny.  I used to be naturally skinny, but started to get a spare tire and made adjustments accordingly, so I believe I am a decent source to ask.

Third, you need to follow through.  Execute your plan as best you can, sticking to it for as long as possible.  If you trip up, forget about it and keep going.  It is common to miss a workout once in a while, what’s important is that you keep going and don’t use that as an excuse to stop.

These three basic steps will lead to pretty good results for most things you want to try.  I will post about a slightly more sophisticated system that I call “the process of awesome” in a future post, but really, to do most things, these three steps are good enough.

Compare this simple “good enough” three step approach with an attempt to be perfect.  If you were trying to do something perfectly, you’d get stuck in step one, researching a plan.  Especially when it comes to dieting, there are so many opinions, plans, research papers, etc, that you’d never stop reading and get started.